<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mage: The Dirty Version &#8211; The Hegemony</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobunited.com/mobunitedmedia/2009/11/22/mage-the-dirty-version-the-hegemony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobunited.com/mobunitedmedia/2009/11/22/mage-the-dirty-version-the-hegemony/</link>
	<description>Killing Someone Else&#039;s Darlings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:06:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dataweaver</title>
		<link>http://www.mobunited.com/mobunitedmedia/2009/11/22/mage-the-dirty-version-the-hegemony/comment-page-1/#comment-2933</link>
		<dc:creator>Dataweaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobunited.com/mobunitedmedia/?p=490#comment-2933</guid>
		<description>Hmm... I&#039;m seriously considering adapting the Hegemony, the Æther Society, and the Transhuman Adepts for use in Mage: the Awakening, in conjunction with the Gifted Science section from the Mage Chronicler&#039;s Guide.  (That section covered a lot of ground in terms of re-interpreting the magic system as a technological paradigm; but it did nothing to address the organizations that should provide the culture in which gifted scientists ought to operate.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I&#8217;m seriously considering adapting the Hegemony, the Æther Society, and the Transhuman Adepts for use in Mage: the Awakening, in conjunction with the Gifted Science section from the Mage Chronicler&#8217;s Guide.  (That section covered a lot of ground in terms of re-interpreting the magic system as a technological paradigm; but it did nothing to address the organizations that should provide the culture in which gifted scientists ought to operate.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkerDays_Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mobunited.com/mobunitedmedia/2009/11/22/mage-the-dirty-version-the-hegemony/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkerDays_Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobunited.com/mobunitedmedia/?p=490#comment-467</guid>
		<description>The Kyriarchs revealed - excellent!  Really like the Curia.  The Cabal of Pure Thought were old favourites in Ascension, so cool to see them represented here as a full convention.  No direct correlate for the Void Engineers - I&#039;d guess that they fall under the Ingenium well enough.  Also, they&#039;re less philosophically distinct, so it makes sense not to have them as a Convention, I suppose, but rather cast their science as set of tools used by the Hegemony?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kyriarchs revealed &#8211; excellent!  Really like the Curia.  The Cabal of Pure Thought were old favourites in Ascension, so cool to see them represented here as a full convention.  No direct correlate for the Void Engineers &#8211; I&#8217;d guess that they fall under the Ingenium well enough.  Also, they&#8217;re less philosophically distinct, so it makes sense not to have them as a Convention, I suppose, but rather cast their science as set of tools used by the Hegemony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandchigger</title>
		<link>http://www.mobunited.com/mobunitedmedia/2009/11/22/mage-the-dirty-version-the-hegemony/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>sandchigger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobunited.com/mobunitedmedia/?p=490#comment-466</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see more about the various Conventions. I mean, we only got the ItX Convention book for Revised; it&#039;d be a shame not to see more about all these guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see more about the various Conventions. I mean, we only got the ItX Convention book for Revised; it&#8217;d be a shame not to see more about all these guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

